SF School District

We lack TRANSPARENCY in local government

I agree with Joe that there is a lack of leadership, experience, accountability, common sense and diligence;

That kind of leadership requires listening, relationship-building, and the willingness to work together. It means re-establishing trust among institutions that have drifted apart and reminding everyone that Sioux Falls’ success has always come from collaboration, not isolation.

Many of these leadership issues can be solved with one word; TRANSPARENCY. When you have a government that is open to the public’s ideas by bringing them along with the process you get more involvement and when the public is more involved you have a better planned community. The problem with local government on all levels isn’t a lack of leadership or even laziness it’s a lack of openness and accountability. You could have 9 monkeys sitting on the dais and the city would still run incredibly well because of transparency. I am of the position that it doesn’t matter who is on that dais, as another realtor announces a run for council today, if we have folks that are willing to open the books and bring the public along that is ALL the leadership you need. Because real leaders are honest, open and accountable.

THE SOLUTION TO THE TRANSIENT PROBLEM IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES

After reading this article last night about transients at the downtown library I sent this email to Jodi;

I am putting an invitation to you and a companion to ride on the back of my pedi-cab on a weeknight DTSF after dark, I will take you to all the places transients congregate and you can see just how serious it is.

But what I found fascinating about the article is Police Chief Thum offering a solution to the problem without realizing it;

My point is not to lack compassion for those who probably could benefit from a quiet, safe place to spend their day. Ideally, we’d find something more productive for people to do in such a place — maybe we offer classes or even the chance to create art — but if safe shelter with a way to charge a phone is really all people are looking for, maybe we need to create that somewhere other than the library.

We need the library to function as it was intended to promote literacy and access to information and related resources, not as a social services agency. 

At the top of the post I talked about common sense in government. Are you listening to what you are saying? Maybe we need a temporary shelter? It is pretty obvious to me that we need a temporary shelter this winter for these folks where they can stay 24/7 if they wish. Will it cost money? Sure, but the alternative is paying for ER visits when we are scraping them from the cold concrete in a parking ramp which costs way more then just funding a facility for the winter months. I would also hand every single one of them a bus ticket when they arrive at the shelter if they desire to go home.

This is what I mean when it comes to leadership. You obviously see the issue, you also obviously see the solution, so why not fix it?

Stop the Opt Out

Local group is circulating this petition, I signed it today;

The Sioux Falls School Board just voted to approve ANOTHER opt out – this time to the tune of $2.1M for 10 years. The opt-out will allow the school district to raise additional funds beyond what they get in their existing tax levy and state aid, by collecting taxes from property owners in the district. SD Law allows citizens to bring this to a vote of the people (rather than a board of five unilaterally making the decision for all of Sioux Falls residents.) Deadline is July 17th. We will be circulating petitions to bring the opt-out to a public vote. This group will be for sharing information and locations to sign a petition (if you are a registered voter in the Sioux Falls School District) or if you would like to circulate a petition (have to be a registered voter in the State of South Dakota) you can find out more information for events/opportunities to volunteer at.

You know my feelings on this, stop handing out TIFs like candy and our opt outs would go away.

Instead of Op-outs maybe we need to make TIFS harder to get

Ever since the State Morons in Pierre changed the rules for TIFs (can be for economic development now) They have exploded. I suggest that we limit them to severely damaged lands and low-income housing. The school district just did ANOTHER opt-out, and lied to the public about our taxes increasing. A foot soldier left this comment about the opt-out on Turdbook;

As regular taxpayers are asked to fish into their pockets for $2.1 million of additional money, each year for the next 10 years, be reminded that just for the TIF package given to the developers of The Steel District, the Sioux Falls School District will forego (aka not collect) $1.05 million in real estate tax revenue from those parcels in 2026. For the TIF package given to the developer of Cherapa II, the Sioux Falls School District will forego nearly $1.2 million of real estate tax revenue from those parcels in 2026.

In other words if we started eliminating TIFs and close out the current ones our taxes would actually go down. Did you know that 80% of property taxes paid in the school district and city are from single-family owner occupied homes. So yes, we are paying for these TIFs. And for what? A parking ramp? Public art? Tequila Bar? Seriously! If we eliminated ALL the TIFs we have on the books now the school district would take in MILLIONS in revenue from the big commercial developments. Why are homeowners asked to pay the majority of taxes in Sioux Falls? It should be a 50/50 split between homeowners and commercial property. TIFs never have much of a ROI, studies for decades across the US have shown they don’t stimulate growth and produce very few jobs except when being built. TIFs are a boondoggle and the average Joe is taking it in the shorts. In memoriam of a certain developer who passed recently, the council should make steps to eliminate TIFs from our city, once and for all.

Sioux Falls School District Election

The Sioux Falls School District will hold their election next Tuesday, May 13. There are 4 candidates running for 2 seats, with 1 incumbent running.

While you can vote for 2 candidates, I am only endorsing ONE candidate; Patricia Ringold.

I was in a weird position this time around to NOT know any of the candidates personally so I was able to do my research like everyone else, reading bios, media questions and the candidate forum. I have kept an open mind, and she rises to the top every time. Besides being just an average Jane (not a ladder climber looking to add something to her resume) she has years of experience in youth education and when she talks about the school system and kids you can tell she truly cares and understands.

As for the other candidates, they are all OK, so that is up to you, but what steered me away from them were some of their long winded, meaningless, canned answers. Kelly is the incumbent, yet she hasn’t said a peep about what she has accomplished so far on the board and blabbed about training HS school students for the trades, which is great, but she kept talking about the students as if they were part of some kind of economic development big picture instead of encouraging them to pursue higher education. Werner is a Trumper, but he does have some great ideas, unfortunately he thinks it is OK to display the 10 Commandments in the school room even though it is a clear constitutional violation. Duffy is a canned candidate that the Dems pulled from their hat. An accomplished attorney who made sure she answered every question perfectly. She was handpicked by out going board member Reiter who now serves as her treasurer of her campaign. This kind of crap irritates the piss out of me. Carly, you are done, enjoy your school board retirement. Why do outgoing candidates in this town always have to recruit a replacement for them? It’s irritating and to be quite honest with you it is extremely UNETHICAL and lacks integrity. I think Carly accomplished a lot of great things on the school board, so BRAVO! But let the chips fall where they may. This is why I am telling people to NOT vote for Duffy. This setup disqualifies her and you would think an attorney would know better. Oh, and none of the candidates mentioned our exploding property taxes. You want to know why? Because they avoid controversial topics like a 10 foot pole. I like leaders with spines.