February 2014

Will the TIF application process change

Hard to say how this will be voted on when the 2nd reading comes around (Item#8)

The proposed change in language;

tif-amend

I do know that Jamison, Staggers & probably Anderson will vote for the change. I know that Rolfing, Karsky and Erpenbach are against the change. But the debate on both sides will be interesting to listen to, especially those that are up for re-election. I can’t wait to hear Erpenbach’s defense of the lack of transparency. It might just get a challenger to crawl out from under a rock.

Maybe someone needs to ‘Educate’ Pat about how our city is wasting our taxdollars (Guest Post, Bruce Danielson)

Mr. Lalley of the AL does not seem to understand our recent petition action. So I guess we need to help him.

This petition drive is not to demean our public servants. We need our public employees to keep our system running. What our movement is about is really quite simple.

Our petition drive is simple, it is Constitutional. We have elected leaders, appointed directors and paid news personalities currently shooting from the hip in fear of the public. The public wishes to have a free and open discussion concerning issues touching their lives. We the public, wish to properly debate with our neighbors without our taxpayer treasury being turned against us, the very same public.

In our current petition movement, we are asking the citizens to use Mr. Lalley’s words, their best efforts at “Reason” “Research” “Facts”.  When there are issues to debate and the people rise up, demanding a place at the table of discussion through the petition movement, the official government must step back.

A properly lead government will have a trove of studies and reports outlining community needs. These reports should be written without a predetermined point of view. It is with unbiased report and study results, a proper discussion / debate can be attained. Our current city leadership feels the public needs to be lead to their conclusions without knowing the “Reason” “Research” “Facts”.

We do not want pretty pictures of four color, 3-D presentations of concepts not being seriously considered to be the basis of the discussions. We want real “Reason” “Research” “Facts”.

Our petition movement does not restrict city employees or elected officials from partaking in the citizen effort as everyday citizens.

Our petition effort does not stop the presentation of ideas from the different citizen groups. Citizens of Sioux Falls have many ideas to present in each of these four issues.

Our petition effort does not stop city employees from partaking in the discussions and debate as average citizens.

Our petition effort does not stop elected officials from partaking in the discussions and debate as average citizens.

Our petition effort encourages city employees TO sign petitions. Their supervisors cannot browbeat a city employee or contractor because of a signature.

Our petition effort prevents city officials from restricting their employees constitutional right to be part of the debate.

Our petition efforts does stop the expenditure of taxpayer revenue from being spent on the debates.

Our petition effort stops the use of official office, position , power and money from be in used by city officialdom.

We voters of the city of Sioux Falls are legal adults, we have been educated to understand, reason and act. We do not need a city official with a vested interest in a plan or plans to “educate” the populace, interfering in the debate.

The reason any of these petitions are before the voters this spring, stems from the official bureaucrats possibly returning favors? Wanting to implement a 50 year plan their grandparents wanted? Settle an old personal score? We the public, who pays the bill, says in these efforts, “We don’t know and we want to find out”.

So to make it very clear, we don’t have anything against our fellow citizens who work for us as city employees or bureaucrats. We appreciate the hard work they perform on our behalf. We wish to have them as part of our public debate. They are our fellow citizens who have to put up with much.

Mr. Lalley has a cute phrase he uses to which can be used to demean us, “Best Little City in America”. If you are going to use this phrase Mr. Lalley, you have a lot to understand. We have a lot of people who wish to be heard to make it better.  The people wish to be heard without filters paid for by our own tax dollars. If the officials feel they need to defend themselves on these citizen ballot efforts, they are citizens. So speak up as citizens, without using your citizen paid for office budget to finance your place at the decision table. The public wants a real debate. We want real “Reason” “Research” “Facts” to make this the Best Little City in America.

Double Standard on Annexation?

We will pull all the stops for Walmart, not so much for little property owner;

The residents of Prairie Meadows subdivision get many of the benefits of living near Sioux Falls.

They drive the streets, their kids go to Sioux Falls schools and they have city sewer service.

But the 75 homes in the subdivision near 41st Street and Tea-Ellis Road aren’t in the city. Technically, they’re in Wayne Township.

“They should be part of Sioux Falls,” said Jeff Schmitt, head of planning and zoning for the city.

If that happens — and the 89-acre area has been the subject of annexation talks for years — residents could pay $25,000 per lot for improvements to streets and utilities.

Not sure what to think of this, but when the city/state is willing to put millions into infrastructure/traffic upgrades for Walmart then turn around and charge thousands for the same thing, makes you wonder a bit.

Toulouse-Lautrec at the Washington Pavilion

Henri-de-Toulouse-Lautrec-9509115-1-402
To say I am mildly excited about seeing his exhibit at the Pavilion is an understatement. While he may not be my favorite artist of all time, he is high on the list. Heck, I named my backyard patio the ‘Toulouse-Lautrec’, because I modeled it after a picture of him on his patio.

But as usual, when you go digging at the Pavilion, you are bound to find something that isn’t quite right;

At the center of this exhibition is a rare collection of approximately 150 works on paper by Toulouse-Lautrec. This includes 12 of his iconic posters as well as 35 of his sketches, which were often the draft ideas for the posters themselves.

So what are the other 103 pieces? Prints? Reproductions? Giclees? Here we go down the Norman Rockwell road once again.

Not at all, they are Litho’s and VERY nice reproductions. If I had one complaint about the exhibit (which is a very large collection) it would be the collectors need to re-frame the collection (looks very Hobby-Lobbish)

So this got me curious about the ‘origin’ of the exhibit. Greece. You know, the country where people are actually wearing barrels and suspenders for clothing.

If you do a little research on the ‘Private’ museum the collection came from, you have to remember the economic crisis in Greece, or should I say the bottom freaking dropping out?

They have had only one major exhibition in the past two years, something about math. Seems the Greece’s treasury department needs to head over and take a gander at it.

Enough of that, the show is fantastic, I wasn’t even irritated by the $10 entrance fee, but I will say this, I was disappointed with the appearance of the Visual Arts Center.

First off, they knocked out some rag-tag wall at the back of the main gallery (Everist) for the Native gallery (don’t trip on the weird ramp) secondly, as you will see in the image below, they had some kind of trash and seating project going on in the middle of the exhibit (probably an educational program) but why not clean it up? It’s Saturday, not Tuesday, lots of traffic, in fact I saw several viewers staring at this collaboration of trash cans.

tl-trash

I have also heard, the PAV has been renting out the VAC for private receptions, this might be the remnants.

The other inklings I have heard is that the Pavilion has been ‘cutting’ corners. Which surprises me, because, they get a large subsidy from the taxpayer. It has probably been since this summer that I have been there, but the one thing I have noticed is how un-inviting and dirty it is. Even in the Everist Gallery, with a ‘world-class’ exhibit, the carpet was extremely dirty, scuffs all over the walls, shades drawn over the expansive windows (not sure why) and this appearance of ‘Half-Assery’. I was surprised the art was not crooked and laying on the floor.

Trust me, I keep my house about as clean as a truck-stop. But if you are charging an entrance fee to see TL, get out the vacuum cleaner.

I have often said, the new city council needs to ask for a FULL FORENSIC & FINANCIAL AUDIT of the Pavilion. Things are not right over there, shit is going on!

But they could save taxpayers a lot of dough, and forgo the audit, and just fire the current management company, you know, like everybody.

It breaks my heart, because I worked there the first 4 years it was opened, had an art exhibit there, donated to arts night and was personal friends with the first director. I really felt it could work, and that is what is frustrating what I see when I walk into the place.

VIOLET’s Reunion Show

My favorite local band of all time (except of course for The Marbles, Wumpus, Janitor Bob, Blues Bashers, Standard Time . . . you get the picture) is planning a reunion show at The District, early Spring.

I found out last night, and was chuckling today when I was randomly going through the microfiche at the DT library, doing some old photo research and found the ‘TEMPEST’ files.

It was worth a quarter to print this Pomp Room ad out. Almost 18 years ago. WOW!

violet-final

 

Mr. Luden, former member of Rich Show’s first SF band, NO Direction, sent me this link today.

Here’s a little video from the last show.