Art Maze II kicks Ass!
Click to Enlarge
You can still see it tonight, 6th and Phillips in JAM Art. It’s FREE!
Click to Enlarge
You can still see it tonight, 6th and Phillips in JAM Art. It’s FREE!
I will make this very clear from the beginning. I am not sure if the TAX-OPT out petitioners got enough signatures to turn in tomorrow. I can also tell you, I am NOT a fan of Lora Hubbel and her teabagger ways, but to call someone ‘sinister’ for doing simple math is ridiculous;
Beddow’s concerns are shared by Board President Todd Thoelke and Vice President Kate Parker, who called the robocalls “sinister” and “misinformation.”
The conflict stems from a school board meeting last month, in which the five-member board unanimously approved an additional opt out from the property tax limits to the tune of $5 million annually for 10 years.
Yeah, let’s talk ‘sinister’. Up until last week, I thought the OPT-OUT was $5 million OVER 10 years. In fact, that was the statement the school board made during the meeting they approved the tax. Even at the time, I said to someone “While I don’t agree with the opt-out, kinda seems like peanuts to me.” It was never really explained in the meeting that this was $5 MILLION, PER YEAR, for 10 YEARS! Which equals $50 million.
Uh, ok. Not peanuts.
So who really is being ‘sinister’ here? The petitioners that did simple math, or the School Board for misleading taxpayers? I’ll support a tax increase, but when you have to go on the sly to get it done, forget about it.
And can we trust them when they say things like this?
Board members have said repeatedly that they don’t intend to take the full opt out amount, only what they need to keep the bills paid.
So I ask this question in defense? If you are not sure if you need the money, than why take the opt-out? BECAUSE! THEY INTEND TO TAKE THE FULL AMOUNT! You don’t take a loan from the bank and say, “I only need four grand, but what the heck, why don’t I take out six.” Well maybe you do, and you are no smarter than our school board.
I think that is one of the things that angers me besides the misleading about the entire amount, they seem to think tax payers need to believe the hook line and sinker notion that once a tax is implemented that government won’t take all of it.
LMFAO!
From the dawn of taxes, they will be taken and they will spend it all, and it will NEVER sunset, or be refunded.
But what makes this even more hilariously tragic is one of the school board members admits the petitioners math is correct, but they wouldn’t dare go after all of it.
On Thursday, Thoelke said definitively that the board will not take the full $50 million over the next 10 years.
His concern is that the robocall makes the board’s decision sound “complicated and sinister.”
“It’s just a shame that they have to go to those tactics to scare people,” Thoelke said.
Then why ask for it? I don’t order a 12 oz ribeye if I am only hungry for a 4 oz sirloin. People should be scared, of your lying.
Mary Buysse, SD Learn leader, stood by the group’s robocall, which went out to 18,000 households in Sioux Falls on Thursday. Buysse’s group paid for the calls.
 “There’s no scare tactic,” she said. “A $5 million opt out for 10 years is $50 million. They can say they may not use it, but we don’t know that.”
We will have to wait until the City of Sioux Falls June finance report comes out before we know the actual impact of the Soccer tournament to the sales tax rolls. The ‘CLAIM’ by the organizers and CVB is a $17 million dollar impact which boils down to about $480,000 for the city tax rolls (this is counting the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Penny entertainment tax BUT not the state’s 2 penny cut) which would be a $160K bump to each penny that we would not have normally seen the year before. Since the numbers have been running a little flat to under what it was last year, this bump should be noticeable.
As I have also argued the city probably kicked in about $20-40K in resources to help support the tournament in traffic control and park maintenance.
We’ll see if the $17 million dollar guestimate holds any water really soon.
The Sioux Falls Development Foundation is trying to get former SF residents to come back;
“Our intent is to bring more employees back to Sioux Falls,†Clemensen said. “We’re looking to fill a portion of our more than 3,000 open positions in the city.â€
I think is it a great idea 1) it keeps the boomtown meth lab rats away and 2) as long as they are not coaxing people back for $11 an hour jobs.
Jeff made some great points about crime and its relationship with population increases, he also stated the obvious about ambulance service in Sioux Falls; all we are asking for is more mutual aid.