January 2025

Let’s Talk About Trump’s New Free Speech Executive Order

This is from the NCAC (National Coalition Against Censorship) which have an interesting take on this;

Yesterday, President Trump signed an Executive Order entitled “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship.” The Executive Order aims to inhibit the government’s ability to censor–or pressure private companies to censor–constitutionally protected speech.


The National Coalition Against Censorship has long argued that the government should never use its power to pressure companies to censor voices that the government cannot censor itself. Last year, when we filed our amicus brief in the case Murthy v. Missouri with the Supreme Court, we argued that the Biden administration had overstepped its bounds in pressuring social media companies to remove speech it deemed misinformation. That brief was filed in service of the nonpartisan principle that our constitution rightly forbids the government from using its resources to silence unpopular viewpoints. At the very heart of our Democracy is the idea that we have a right to hear and engage with dissent over government policy.  
We welcome new restrictions on the government’s complicity in censorship. However, the Executive Order is vague, and its true value will be in its application over the coming days, months, and years. The strength of our free expression right is defined by its consistency: free speech must be indivisible, and the government must avoid picking winners and losers in political debates regardless of politics or party and regardless of popularity and power. We hope that this Executive Order signals a true commitment to keeping all voices free from government censors. 

This is something I have been telling my friends with Trump, he is so unpredictable that some of his policies might even be good. But you also have to understand that if he sees Libs praising him he will change course. Also, private companies can censor whoever they want to. The 1st Amendment applies to GOVERNMENT censorship, that’s it, full stop.

See what happens with public engagement in Sioux Falls

Not sure which SFSD Board Members pulled their arses from their heads, but this was a wonderful way to engage the public about elections, etc.;

Nearly two dozen people attended an informational meeting about what it takes to be a school board member, and how to run for school board, for the Sioux Falls School District on Tuesday night.

Sioux Falls School District Board of Education President Carly Reiter and vice president Dawn Marie Johnson led the meeting, and explained that board members approve budgets and policies, hire and oversee the superintendent, develop and review policies, represent community interests in education and attend appropriate city, state and national events.

Imagine that, when you have a meeting at 6 PM on Tuesday night you can actually get people to attend (though this is at the same time of the council meeting.) You are also helping people to navigate the political landscape. While I appreciate the public engagement, we know that they will be handpicked, funded candidates that Poops and Matt Paulson pull from one of their prosperity gospel churches. The right wingers will likely put someone up to, though they didn’t have much luck the last two elections. I wonder if they also talked about how to file a campaign finance form that is not perjured?

I think it would be great if 24 people ran for school board. That’s what public engagement is about, not hiding in your basement doing jumping jacks.

More Closed Government in Sioux Falls

I didn’t watch the police briefing on Tuesday over a long holiday weekend. Since the SFPD public info officer doesn’t usually tell us what is going on, I really don’t watch them anymore. If I wanted to listen to someone telling me nothing I would tune into the Greg Belfrage show. A concerned citizen told me yesterday they tuned in because of an incident in their neighborhood around 1 AM Sunday. If you look at the police log all that is listed was a weapons violation and a case report. The citizen tells me it was much deeper than that. Apparently some juveniles were drinking and shooting guns at a party. Did we not learn anything from the kids who wrecked their car on 18th street last year? I guess not. This would have been a great opportunity to alert the public about teenage drinking parties where guns are involved and ask the public for their help stopping these kind of incidents. I understand you can’t name the juveniles involved but you can certainly chastise and CHARGE the adults that are assisting in providing these kids a place to raise hell. Why wouldn’t you say something? I will say it again; OPEN GOVERNMENT = PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT. I guess the SFPD is doing such a whiz bang job these days they don’t even bother to tell us about who is committing crimes in our community because they have it handled. Sure. U Betcha!

Sioux Falls School District asks parents about cell phone use

The SFSD put out this survey recently;

Hello SFSD Parent/Guardian,A committee is meeting to learn more about cell phone/smartwatch use during the school day. Please take the survey by clicking the one-time-use link. Do not forward the link.

Each email address we have on file for parents/guardians receives one invite for the survey.  If you have more than one child, consider answering with your oldest child in mind or coordinate with the other parent to submit responses that represent your feedback for two levels – either elementary, middle, or high school.

The deadline for the survey is Friday, January 31, 2025.

We thank you for your time and participation.

Sincerely,  

Sioux Falls School District

I think they should be banned, and I wouldn’t even allow them to bring them on school property. If your parents need to get a hold of you they can do like my mother did, call the front desk and ask to speak to your child.