Public Utilities

Falls Park, data center and an RFP

(SCOTT L. EHRISMAN (C) 12/16/2025)

You need to watch the informational meeting today where they talk about transforming Falls Park into an entertainment complex. The council pushed back pretty hard. Merkouris expressed he would like to see more of a natural park. I agree, they are cheaper, a lot cheaper, and they pretty much maintain themselves if you plant the right native species. They also look much more beautiful then layers of concrete like we currently have on the greenway (I think it is so funny we call concrete a GREENWAY). And as a visitor staying in a hotel downtown would you much rather take a stroll thru butterflies and flowers instead of a massive concrete path? We could turn Falls Park into a nature gem. Hopefully the next council takes this proposed plan and burns it, oh, and ask for our money back.

Why don’t we learn something from our immense failure of Jacobsen Plaza? What is the most popular part of the Plaza? FREE SH!T!!!! DUH!!!!! Make more natural trails at Falls Park and turn it into a nature wonderland instead of a mini-donut crap hole.

DATA CENTER MOVING FORWARD

The city council approved the 1st reading of zoning for the proposed data center and the conditions. Once again the council has FAILED to ask about the increasing energy costs. Not only is our council voting against our interests this will hurt us financially. Demand will drive up costs. I think if they plan to self-contain the center in 5 years, I would support it. But sucking water and power from us won’t help our rates. I beg the council to do their research. I see a national story EVERY DAY about the increased costs of Data Centers if their water and power is not self contained.

SHAWN ‘FIREBALL’ PRITCHETT HAD A CHANGE OF HEART.

It’s rare, but I gotta give Curtis the Blurtist credit on this one. When the finance director, Pritchett, came to the council tonight to fund motor graders he did his homework and put out an RFP (did his job for once). I believe this is because Curt put a boot up his ass about this and he was NOT going to buy motor graders without having an RFP. Funny how things work out better when you follow rules.

VERNON DID WHAT HE WAS HIRED TO DO

Everyone knows that the city council just wanted a shadow councilor over the next 6 months who won’t ask questions and ink up the rubber stamp. Vernon did not disappoint tonight. Besides his swearing in the only word coming out of Vernon’s mouth tonight was ‘YES’. Good Boy! I hope they gave you a treat.

UPDATE: Cry me a river . . . of crap

UPDATE: What’s with all the crying these days? I see he goes to same stylist as Sue Peterson. The intro was priceless, ‘Known to many as Mayor Mike’. Hey, Buddy, you lost that title 7 years ago, and you ain’t getting it back.

Public Works director, Cotter, did learn something from Huether, turn on the water works, uh I mean sewer works. No doubt it was an exhaustive project for Cotter, over 270 days of construction. But I am not sure it is worth crying about. Mr. Cotter gets paid $232K a year + benefits. We pay these wages because it is important job and it is hard. I compliment Cotter on getting this done, but it is his job. I also fault Cotter for not taking a firmer stand with Mike on the Sewer expansion. This project was supposed to be done BEFORE the Event Center and if we would have gone that route you would have saved taxpayers over $50 million in capital expenses and millions in interest payments, but Mike wanted that tin can so bad he had Cotter bury the project and any discussions about it. Cotter should have got in front of the council and pushed them to implement the project before the Event Center. So I guess it was appropriate to cry. While the project was a success, it would have been a heckuva a lot cheaper if we would have started it 10 years ago.

Rhoden spoke briefly at the end of the presser, and he was the only one that said anything that made sense. He basically said, these are the kind of (infrastructure) projects the government is setup to take care of. I agree, I have often said SF out of control spending could be tapered back by simply dedicating tax dollars to NEEDS not WANTS.

And now that the sewer plant is finished, get ready for the $30 million dollar bond next year to make repairs to the Denty. It’s coming.

WHEN YOU BUY A NEW CAR YOU HAVE TO BUILD A GARAGE FOR IT

I guess the Public Works department is angling for a new garage to house the new snow plows. The rumor is a building 100 x 300 FT. building. This should come as no surprise. They bought all these maintainers now they have to store them somewhere. Funny how the finance director didn’t mention this when he wanted the council to buy the maintainers. Even a pole barn that size will be millions. It reminds me of the applicant who showed up to the Zoning Board for an adjustment on his garage. He wanted to extend his garage 3 feet in the front. When asked his reason he said, “I bought a new truck and it doesn’t fit in the garage.” 🙂

Country Club needs public street for more parking

First, let’s start with transparency. During Item #26’s public hearing in which a private applicant was asking to change parking to diagonal on a public street no where in the meeting did they say who it was and it was presented by the Public Works department. One would assume it is for ONE of the country clubs but all that was said at the meeting was it was ‘for the country club’. Well guess what, both clubs are on that street, so which one? Also, while I don’t oppose the parking change since it is a weird street that only those d-bags use, I found the excuse from the mysterious applicant that they didn’t have ‘land available’ for more parking. Ridiculous! All the country clubs have is LAND! And acres and acres of it! Also, if you don’t have the ‘land’ for additional parking, why not just buy the street/land from the city and make it your own private parking lot? Just another bailout to the rich who don’t need it. I would have said, “You want the land for parking? Then buy it and pay property taxes on it, otherwise, talk to yah later.” and this is what it is about, they want property tax free parking and the council rolled over like old ewes to give it to them, BAAAAAAAA!

Only Curtist the Blurtist voted against it, and my assumption was because he didn’t want taxpayers footing the bill for country club parking. Duh.

I have been enjoying Curt’s rebellion, but don’t fool yourself, this is about supporting a mayoral campaign. Heels thinks he supports her, but me thinks he is Huether’s lap dog*. But Mike may be running for Congress as an Indy. Extra weird. But when you have a corrupt AG vs. a Cajun chef he may have a chance.

*In order for Huether to successfully take the mayorship he must show that the past 8 years of Poops have been worse (I am not going there!) And all Curtist is doing is propping up Mike by dissenting the current administration. I told someone if Curt was so concerned about these things, why didn’t he bring them up 7 years ago? Hey Curt, you are NOT fooling anyone!

Why doesn’t the city own it’s own mil grinder?

While chatting with different employees in the Sioux Falls Public Works department they seem surprised the city would be buying used maintainers for snowplowing and spending that much money for equipment that is essentially only used for plowing snow. Maybe this would be the reason why we have leased for so long?

I also asked about collection times and if they would be effected. They told me NO because they pull drivers from Parks and Rec and other departments like Water, and Fire.

But I guess the large purchase irks the employees because they have been begging the city purchases it’s own mil grinder (I probably have the name of the equipment wrong, but what it basically does is grind down a street a few inches for resurfacing). I guess the city leases the equipment and they have trouble getting it because other contractors are also leasing it at the same time they want to use it. Employees have told me it would save taxpayers $$$ and would be more convenient for our Public Works department. As one employee said to me, “And we get a heckuva a lot more streets fixed, faster.” So while $9 million for some snowplows may be a worthy investment, it seems the city’s priorities once again are whacked!

DATA Centers drive up electricity costs

(FF 19:00)

As you will see from the video, data centers drive up all consumers prices because the electrical provider has to build the infrastructure to handle the load. With a lot of demand it will ultimately drive costs up for all consumers in the region. I am opposed to the DATA center planned in SF joint jurisdiction area because it takes land away for housing AND provides few jobs after it is built. But the effect on the rest of us is not good either.