Were voters hoodwinked by both sides on IM 22?
l3wis 
After the repeal today of IM 22, I started thinking about a rule I usually abide by, Never trust a politician (or politico) farther then you can see them (in person).
As you know, while I sympathize with the pathetic class the South Dakota Democrats have become, I still hold on to my independent roots, and for good reason. Neither party offers many solutions, they are here to protect themselves.
It seems to becoming clearer everyday that IM 22 is an example of when both parties decide to bake a cake together. Yeah, you know how that will turn out. Ever ate a sh*t sandwich?
While I still think the SD GOP is destroying our state with one party rule and the lack of any ethics reform or rules, I still think there are stinkers in the Democratic party.
No doubt, the repeal by the Republic party of South Dakota of IM 22 is stupid. But hey, they are stupid. They should have just let the Supreme Court decide, but they are so worried someone is going to take their bag of chips they didn’t want to hear the truth from them, they wanted to make their own rules.
Not such a bad idea really, when you know your power is going to be taken away from you after 40 years of iron fist rule. Just look at their heros, like that character Bill Janklow, who worked in public service most of his life and became a multimillionaire. Gee, wonder how that works? Cream of the crop ass-wipes, who wiped their asses with IM 22 today.
But, But, But.
What about all this talk about all the ‘outside’ and ‘dark’ money from the supporters of IM 22.
For the record, I think all political money is ‘dark’.
Which brings us to Mr. Weiland.
Why couldn’t he drive to Pierre and make his case? Really? Why couldn’t he?
Maybe it was about money? Was it Rick? Was it about money? Or was it about us?
Good question.
The Sunshine state still remains dark, very dark. Both sides of the coin.
