1st Amendment

Is the city slowly chipping away at Owen’s hard work? (H/T – Crafty Ruckus)

I don’t know if you listened to Sue Roust’s presentation at the informational last Monday, but I thought she talked about a couple of interesting topics.

1) The spreadsheet on public input, &

2) that the CVB (convention visitors) had received an RFP (request for proposal) to host the International Institute of Municipal Clerks Conference in 2016 (see January 30, 2012 Informational meeting).

Our City Clerk’s office had met with the CVB and decided that because May 2016 is, “a busy time with elections and new Council members taking office.” that they would not pursue this invitation from IIMC.

Sue Roust, City Clerk, says,  “There was a consensus that an even-numbered year was not very good, but that we would watch and see if the RFP comes around for 2017. That might be something worth looking at further.”

As a taxpayer, I was sitting there thinking, “Huh?!”  We are most likely going to be asked to subsidize this monstrosity of an Events Center Complex (remember all three facilities:  Arena, Convention Center, Events Center) are now going to be considered as one, and we have now TURNED DOWN an invitation to bid on a very high profile conference?!  As everyone knows, Mike and his team sold the EC to the voters based on convention business being the MAJOR TENANT!

City Director Mike Cooper was asked if he had been aware of this, and his answer was NO.  At the very least, there appears to be a HUGE disconnect and lack of communication going on here.

PART II

A separate issue is the redesign of the City’s website. Would we as citizens have access to the same amount of information as we have had in the past, or would this be an attempt to limit information? Unfortunately, it may prove to be the latter. If you have attended Park Board meetings on a regular basis for the past 4-1/2 years, often times, you can go on to the city’s website to view the minutes from past meetings.  If you try to do this recently, you find that instead of the past three years being available that there now was only the previous month’s minutes.

The Director of Parks and Rec said the city is in the process of redesigning the website and that it will be rolled out in the next couple of weeks.

If you look at both the Board of Historic Preservation and the Public Parking Advisory Board’s minutes they both still show three years worth of past meeting minutes (they are both examples of the amount of information that should be available vs. the “new look” of the Park Board minutes).

Be on the lookout for missing info on the newly redesigned website.

 

SF City Council still looking at moving public input until end of meetings

Dean ‘No Goats’ Karsky is at it again, suggesting that the public waits until the very end of a council meeting before airing their concerns. (FF: 19:00) His reasoning? He doesn’t think city directors (who we pay with our taxdollars) should have to wait thru public input, because it would make things ‘smoother’. He also thinks people should have to sign their name if they are giving public testimony. Why? If they state their name before their rant, good enough for me. Why do some city councilors think the public’s opinion is unimportant and bothersome? Who elected you? Oh that’s right, Dean just had to kiss a few councilor’s asses to get elected.

Most people who come to give public testimony are doing it on their own time. City directors and other contractors doing business with the city are compensated very well by us to attend these meetings. The (volunteer) public should be able to air their concerns at the beginning of the meetings. Any attempt by the city council to change this will come with great resistance. GREAT RESISTANCE!

Use your brains for once and leave it as is. It is not broken and does not need to be fixed.

UPDATE: This is the document outlining the different public input variances. As you can see, all of the SD towns listed have them at the beginning of the meeting. And heck, the county doesn’t even have a time limit; public input spreadsheet

Leave public input as is

Here we go again, another set of city councilors want to make a bunch of changes to something that is not broken (informational meeting);

“Doing it on the front end of the meeting has never made much sense to me,” Councilor Vernon Brown

Huh? It makes perfect sense. The public should not have to WAIT for the city to do their business. City directors and others doing BUSINESS with the city can wait. Both are either getting paid directly from city taxpayers or benefitting from a city service. It is the one chance citizens can make their grievances heard without being inconvenienced.

Munson used to pull this crap where all of his rich developer friends got to speak first on an issue, the platting fee tax increase comes to mind. How did that turn out? The taxpayer’s got bilked and the developers have yet to put in any significant amount of money.

Citizens need to speak first.

There is one change though I would like to see and hope there is discussion on it. I think if a citizen directly asks questions from the mayor or city council, they should be afforded an answer. If they do not want to be questioned by the mayor or city council during their public testimony, they should have that right also. I just think it is kinda strange the mayor had to wait until the end of the meeting to respond. I also think it is strange that the Council chair just sat there with the gavel in her hand not knowing what to do with it. “Uh, what’s this pretty shiny wooden hammer for?” She could have allowed the constituents to respond to the mayor without it turning into a parking lot rumble.

Is public testimony uncomfortable? Sure. And if that bothers you, you are welcome to resign from your position. I’m sure Darrin Smith can fill you in on how to go about that.

City attorney David Fiddle-Faddle proposing some interesting changes to the ethics board procedures

I found some of his proposals to be very interesting, especially in this section;

FIRST PARAGRAPH: What confidentiality rules? A private citizen is protected by the US Constitution and the 1st Amendment. They don’t have to keep ANYTHING confidential. If I file a complaint against an elected official for a certain reason, I can tell anyone I want to about the complaint. City charter and ordinance does not trump the US Constitution. Sorry Fiddle-Faddle, you are not fooling anyone with this proposal.

SECOND PARAGRAPH: The word frivolous means all kinds of things to all kinds of people, as defined in the dictionary;

1. characterized by lack of seriousness or sense: frivolousconduct.

2. self-indulgently carefree; unconcerned about or lacking anyserious purpose.

3. (of a person) given to trifling or undue levity: a frivolous,empty-headed person.

4. of little or no weight, worth, or importance; not worthy of serious notice: a frivolous suggestion.

What may be important to you, may not be important to me. This proposal is just an out for the ethics board to throw out complaints they don’t want to deal with. I can see why Fiddle-Faddle was unemployed when he came crawling to the city for a job.
ENTIRE PROPOSED CHANGES; ethicchanges

Don’t worry, I will still let you be Anon-Chickenshits on my site (H/T – AG)

I know most of you, so I do a pretty good job of filtering out the psychos – sometimes. But this can’t be good news for ANON commenters on the Argue Endorser’s website;

Gannett this month will begin a groupwide initiative requiring readers to become Facebook members before they are allowed to submit online comments. The move covers all of Gannett’s U.S. newspaper and broadcast sites as well as USA Today. The publisher tested swapping commenting management from Pluck to Facebook at four newspaper sites before making the switch. A memo issued by the publisher said it will continue to use Pluck’s software for other website functions, at least for the short-term. Gannett follows a growing group of newspaper publishers that have opted to use Facebook as a conduit through which readers can post comments. Among them, The Orange County (Calif.) Register, MediaNews Group, Tribune Co., Media General and The San Diego Union-Tribune.

STORMLAND TV already does this on their site. I like it. Wanna say something? Back it up. I also believe you can delete your own comments, if you misspoke 🙂

I totally busted a city snowplow operator bitching about snow gates on the KELO site, and he deleted the comments. I guess losing all of that overtime got him worried.