State Legislature

THE WAR ON E-BIKES HAS BEGUN

I knew when Sally rolled into office for a second term with his anti-electric agenda, the war on e-bikes would begin. The industry was already collapsing on itself since most of them came about during Covid and once fat lazy Americans could go back to driving cars to work, their bikes are collecting dust or are sitting at a pawn shop. In fact you can buy non-used older models for about 1/3 of what they cost new. There have been tons of regs passed across the country that have really killed sales. Many states either limit throttling to a certain speed OR it is NOT allowed. A lot of the newer bikes have PAS only, that means you only get assistance while pedaling and have no throttle only pedal activated motor. This means slower starts and since an e-bike is really a motorcycle when you are NOT pedaling and only throttling is probably the reason states have limited throttling. Which I totally understand. I hardly use my throttle except to push off, while riding I can maintain speeds depending on my pedaling cadence and PAS level. I can max out at about 14 MPH in PAS 1 and 33+ MPH in PAS 5, all controlled by my pedaling and no throttle. Believe it or not, I like the exercise. If you bought an e-bike to ride like a motorcycle, go buy a motorcycle and get off the trails.

New Jersey went a step farther and put age restrictions on the bikes. You will also have to have a valid driver’s license or equivalent for an e-bike (you will be able to get an e-bike license if you CAN’T get a car license) and you will have to carry insurance.

The reasoning is that a lot of teens are getting killed in NJ on E-Bikes. OK. So how do any of these laws fix that? The age restrictions, sure, I don’t take issue with that. But the other crap? Really? This just sounds like a scam by the insurance companies to expand into another market. They look at these as motorcycles, and they are, IF they have a throttle, but if they don’t they are simply a bike with a battery. Personally I think the industry should stop putting throttles on them.

It angers me, not only the license and registration part, but the insurance grab. The original reason I bought an e-bike was to lose weight, and it worked! But in that process I realized that an e-bike is so functional and multi-purpose that I use it for everything. I also like that I don’t have to put any gas in it. I do spend a lot on maintenance. In fact 3x more than on my car a year, but I love the freedom. Now days when I leave the house, the only decision I have to make is ‘which bike do I ride today?’ depending on the weather.

I think it would be a f’ing travesty if they started requiring e-bikes to be registered with the state, I will revolt like a MOFO! There has been talk of this over the past couple of years and I have convinced moderate Republicans to hold the line on it, and so far they have held back the goons both on the left and the right, but I think the MAGA steam is a building, so we need to watch this.

It is also a kick in the nuts to the guy who is just trying to get back on his feet out of prison, and was able to pick up a decent ride at a pawn shop, and the next thing he knows he needs a DL to ride this thing* and he can’t get one because he just spent 3 years in the penn for 6 DUI’s. When we talk about re-offenders in Sioux Falls, this kind of crap contributes to it.

*I also find it funny to think they can police this. They already make throttle e-bikes now with hidden batteries and even motors. Some even have cruise control (mine does) so the throttle can be hidden in the app.

If any of these hair brain ideas pass in SD, it certainly won’t make our lives better. I would agree that throttles are BAD if you don’t know how to use them and maybe there should be age restrictions, but all that other crap, no way. Maybe another idea would be requiring all e-bike shops to offer a FREE one-hour class once a month on e-bike safety. Oh, and it would be nice if I could buy full coverage insurance for my e-bike, but right now, I can’t find it. So there you have that.

The State of SD needs to eliminate GOED

I don’t have a problem with the office, most states have a department like this. But our version of GOED has been corrupt for years. In fact, I got a GOED director fired during the Huether administration. I have never trusted anyone in that office;

Steve Westra was South Dakota’s commissioner of economic development four years ago when the office first agreed to provide financial assistance for a CJ Schwan’s company project.

After leaving state government, he’s now a vice president for the company, which has benefited from state grant and loan approvals totaling $69 million.

All the while, the chairman of the state board that approved some of the aid, Jeff Erickson, has also been a member of the CJ Schwan’s board of directors.

Have yah met Steve Westra? I had the pleasure(?) one time. Doesn’t surprise me that him and his sidekick are cashing in, I think I would have been surprised if he hadn’t.

But corruption aside, why is the state giving millions of my tax dollars to a processed food plant? Look around the next time you are out in public, do you think we need more processed foods? Or more $16 an hour jobs? No thanks. Just look at these stats from one of their products;

FOOD?

Well at least there is some Potassium in there 🙁

The one thing that has always bugged me about the GOED office is the ridiculous crap they will bring in with our tax dollars even though these companies planned to move here anyway, provide crappy wages and send all profits out of state. Why are they not attracting more sustainable businesses that pay living wages? Because that work is hard, and you don’t get reach arounds from those companies (golden parachutes).

Some elected officials in the state seem surprised by these revelations. I’m just trying to figure out why it took the media so long to expose it. As I heard recently on a TV show, “We are just monkeys riding a dog in a circus.”

Well, at least monkeys eat a lot of Potassium (nanners).

Emmett Reistroffer Announces Campaign for South Dakota House District 35


RAPID CITY, SD — Local business and public policy professional Emmett Reistroffer today announced his campaign for the South Dakota House of Representatives, District 35, running in
the Republican Primary on June 2nd.
Reistroffer promises straightforward, no-bull leadership that puts the people of District 35 first, prioritizing real taxpayer relief, public safety and long-term reforms to ensure fiscal responsibility and bring accountability and transparency to Pierre.
“District 35 is full of brave men and women who’ve served our country and hardworking families just trying to make ends meet. I’m running for them,” said Reistroffer.

UPDATE: Sioux Falls ‘Rando’

UPDATE: During the informational today there was NO apology from the Parks Department over the detour debacle. But, Councilor Sigette questioned who planned the detours. They replied ‘They did.’ Which seems like a Don Kearney Swanson kind of fib. When I attended the last PTAB meeting the same question was asked of a different parks rep and they replied sheepishly that the contractors actually planned it. So who is telling the truth? It is still disgusting to me that A CITY EMPLOYEE went on TurdBook trying to blame riders for the poorly planned detours. When people say city employees have our best interest I just point to something like this or the runaround and transfers you get when you ask a simple question from a city customer support person on the phone, and they NEVER get back to you.

At the Fiscal meeting, only one committee member was opposed to increasing reserves, Merkouris, and his short and sweet rationale made perfect sense. Why have this money that we haven’t spent in the past (because of State and Federal assistance) and now we want to increase it? He didn’t see the emergency, and neither do I.

IS THIS JUST ANOTHER TAX SCAM TO BUILD THE CONVENTION CENTER?

During the discussion of the reserve increases it was mentioned that if we do this our bond rating will go up. Well wouldn’t that be convenient when you need to fund a Convention Center Bond without a new tax revenue source. This appears to be just another f’ing scam from Poops to get his Convention Center in a railroad swamp built . . . and the council will clap like seals.

——————-

There have been so many ‘tidbits’ over the last week that I will just give a brief review.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUIT GOING TO TRIAL

I was told yesterday that the affordable housing development suit AGAINST the city is moving to trial. Ironically, the judge that signed off on the trial just retired. So a trial date has not been set, and they still have to determine if it will be a jury trial. The city and it’s legal counsel tried to get the case dismissed (it was dismissed out of Federal Court but referred to state court). If it is a jury trial it will be a slam dunk for the plaintiff. Basically the city is allegedly holding a development hostage over a affordable housing dispute and NOT allowing them to sell the properties (giving occupancy permits). The city has been up to some real shady/vengeful crap and it will be exposed in the trial. Hopefully they will park a food truck in the court room so some of the media shows up.

CAN NEIGHBORS SUE THE CITY OVER REZONES FOR VIOLATING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN?

So someone in the community who knows a lot about planning and development (not a public employee or politician) informed me of something interesting. They said, “Yah know, neighbors can sue the city over violating the comprehensive plan when approving rezones that are not compatible with that plan.”

So what does this mean? Basically if you are a homeowner and an adjacent homeowner wants to rezone their property to something else, like commercial, they have to go thru a compatibility study (see ex below)

If this study shows that ANY of the compatibility numbers are under 5, it puts the rezone into question. So if the PC and City Council approve a rezone when the compatibility numbers are NOT ALL 5’s and the adjacent neighbors are opposed, this gives them the legal authority to sue over the rezone since it didn’t meet the requirements of the comprehensive plan.

FISCAL COMMITTEE MEETING FOR WHAT?

As we know, this administration and council have NOT been transparent often playing games with agendas in order to mislead or confuse. Committee meetings are usually random with this council, and they decided to have another random Fiscal meeting with a random agenda that says ‘Overview of Proposed Ordinance’ with no attached documents. My assumption is they are going to talk about the reserves and other fiscal items, but why not list what you are going to discuss? Why the secrecy? Makes you wonder if they are concocting some kind of tax scheme to get us to pay for the new Convention Center?

WILL THE SIOUX FALLS PARKS DEPARTMENT FINALLY APOLOGIZE FOR REC TRAIL DETOURS?

This should be a great smoke and mirrors show;

Recreation Trail Planning & Maintenance by Josh Johnson, Park Operations Manager; Mike Patten, Park Development Manager

At this point I really don’t care that you f’kd up, and I really don’t care about your f’ing excuses and finger pointing. Admit you screwed up with planning and apologize to the folks that pay your wages. I took a ride this morning on a spur towards family park that got a fresh squeeze of oil this summer over the top of horrible cracks. It is so bumpy if you go over 5 MPH in one of the sections you have to wear a mouthpiece or you teeth will rattle out of your head. I was reading a story this week about how Howard Dean is helping to build bike trails across the US on old rail lines, glad to see that no one from our parks department is involved.

GOLF CART TOURS ON THE BIKE TRAIL?

I told you a few weeks back about a friend who took a golf cart on the bike trail (he is disabled and cannot ride a bike). He told me that his mom drove him in the cart and they got a lot of strange looks but it was permitted due to his disability. When he first started researching this the parks department had to look into Federal statutes to see if it was legal. I guess they decided that they would take a shot at it because I saw three, 4-seater golf carts being driven by parks employees on Friday afternoon on the trail. I looked on the city website to see if I could sign up and found nothing about the rides. I wonder if this is recent? They did have permits taped to the hoods of the carts. I have been trying to get people to take bike trail tours on my Rickshaw and have only had 4 couples so far. It’s a beautiful tour. (my trike is a Class II so it is legal on the trail).

THE BOARD OF REGENTS IS TURNING USD INTO A ‘TACO’ UNIVERSITY

Rhoden must feel like a real chump;

USD said Hook’s deletion of the post and issuing an apology were enough to stay at the school.

The Board of Regents were probably told by legal counsel that you will lose this 1st Amendment case, and after you lose your reputation as an institution will go in the toilet. This was a fiscal decision to keep the professor NOT a constitutional one. I hope this professor goes on a speaking tour in SD about the 1st Amendment. When handed lemons . . . And always remember, when referring to someone as a NAZI always say WHITE CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST instead, it is the more WOKE, DEI version of NAZI the radical right has adopted.

WHY DIDN’T WE PUT THE PRISON IN VERMILLION?

Speaking of the institution in the middle of nowhere, with the recent move of the USD medical school to Sux (and the law school probably coming soon after) it makes you wonder if it is time to mothball USD in Vermillion. One suggestion would be to make the Vermillion campus a vocational school and put all the undergraduate studies in Sux. My suggestion would be to convert it into the new prison (like we did in Springfield years ago) and move the entire university to the SE Tech campus.

Finally, someone in the local media is digging around on TIFs

It took the property tax discussion to get this out in the open, TIFS ARE NOT GOOD, ESPECIALLY IF USED ONLY FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT;

“That told me they were not providing the oversight on these TIFs, that they were just rubber stamping them,” Sibson said.

Well, Sibby, that is what communities across the state do. They are sold a shiny ball and they approve it.

“If they’re not done correctly, they end up being simply subsidies for certain private entities. That’s my overall concern,” Sibson said.

And that is ALL they are these days. Developer Welfare. Parking ramps and condos? How does this benefit the general public? I think if reverted back to Industrial and Affordable Housing which combined only make up 8% of TIFs across the country, you would see more value in them. I think that is what the State Legislature plans to do, or at least make an attempt at changing the law. Good Luck! Sioux Falls and Rapid City and all other larger communities in SD will fight you tooth and nail on this one.