UPDATE: Anonymous Legislator drops the bomb on property taxes and developer greed
l3wis UPDATE: I was told by a former legislator that used to serve with this person, that the person who likely wrote this is Gary Moore.
Not sure ‘who’ this legislator is, but they apparently were in the legislature for at least 14 years, they left the comment on a thread on that ‘other’ blog. Notice the trashing of TIFs, they are absolutely right, they are driving up our taxes;
A few comments on property tax and what needs to be done to accommodate meaningful and responsible legislation to address the issue.
First of all the problem was created at the local level in the name of economic development by local officials and developers. The locals wanted tools in their “economic development tool box” and the legislature always pandered to their wants. In addition developers no longer want investors to in their vocabulary, They want that investment to come from the taxpayer.
This is a complex issue and cannot be resolved in 1 legislative session, but it must be done. I saw this issue become out of control during my 14 years on the tax committee when I was in the legislature, and it has only become worse over the past 10 years.
I believe that to address this issue some concessions must be made now, they include but are not limited to:
1. Put a moratorium on the creation and limit the use of TIFD’s, by local governing bodies beginning immediately. These things have proliferated and one is never paid off before several more are initiated. 12 to 20 active TIFD’s in any local government is profound abuse.
2. Put a moratorium on the creation and/or use of any further discretionary tax formulas. These can also be used in a TIFD and that provision needs to explicitly deny that.
3. Put a moratorium on the creation of any additional subdivision taxing districts within local government.
4. Prohibit the creation of any new political/public subdivisions by the legislature.
5. Restrict/prohibit any new “opt outs” and freeze those already in place from renewing or or expanding those opt outs.
6. Freeze levies for a period for those subdivisions already in existence, except if they should choose to lower the existing levy.
7. Freeze all specials and road tax on real estate at current levels, unless it is a reduction.
8. Reduce bonding authority levels of all local governing bodies.
9. Further restrict growth in local governing bodies budgets.
10. Restrict the BBB tax, BID tax, and city sales tax to current levels, and prohibit the use the use of these taxes to only the general fund with an obligation to reduce property tax. It has become increasingly evident that these dollars are being used as a cash payout to developers with little or no regard for the taxpayer. Restrict BID boards and all other political subdivisions from giving tax revenue to any other body with taxing authority.
11. Require local governing bodies who have acquired real estate to get at minimum the price they paid for the property, rather than just a fraction of what they paid for it.
12. Prohibit any non-profit with taxing authority from asking for any local governing body for contributions outside of their tax base.
This certainly is not a complete list, but it is a beginning. I firmly believe many of these things need to be done for accountability at the local level. I blame the legislature for many of the problems associated to property tax increases. Most off the issues prevalent today are caused by the term “economic development”, in an effort to lower taxes. It doesn’t work, never has worked, and will never work. Countless studies have indicated, time and again, that these issues cause an increase in taxation rather than a reduction.
Furthermore these thing are being abused by the affluent, developers, “non profits”, and the unknowing and uninformed (local elected officials), all at the expense of the local taxpayers,
and that is a fact. Local property taxpayers are being lead to slaughter in the name of corporate welfare, and it needs to stop. If a developer thinks he/she has a valid idea he/they should have no problem finding investors to support the idea without the taxpayers investment which, is a liability on them and never produces a dividend.
I know this will be a hard sell as developers and the unknowing locals will fight it with a vengeance. It has become apparent locally that elected officials don’t run the show, they are kept in the dark and fed sh_t like a mushroom.
Ask some hard questions of local officials about current activities in your area. They refuse to answer, skirt the issue, or lie. I have investigated and found the answers and the truth. Documentation is damning.
To provide adequate property tax relief requires doing a responsible study as to the real problems associated with it. To get a responsible study all of the issue listed previously must be considered, and that cannot be done responsibly during a short legislative session.
Initiating some or all of the previous stated issues can go a long way to improve a comprehensive study and reduce inflated values and property taxes. I understand the legislature did not cause the problem entirely, but they did enhance it and became enablers for the local governing bodies, who do not responsibly use the tools given to them. I know they asked for it, but like a child who doesn’t understand, sometimes you must take away their gift until they can totally understand the ramifications of improper use.
Municipalities are allowed a sales tax. The purpose behind that was to supplement their general fund budget. Not to use as grants to developers for millions of dollars.
There is a lot going on, misuse of those dollars needs to be cornered, if it is not it will only become worse for the taxpayer.
No new taxes would be necessary if local governments were made to be responsible.